Wednesday, September 3, 2008

"One More Point for the Teens"

 Edited On 9/25/08

Is their really needed for a debate concerning this topic about sex education if it has been approved already?

This topic was stretched out and broken into 2 categories sex education and parent-offensive crossing the line. A planned parenthood in Ohio was stopped for crossing the boundaries when it came to a relation of the sex education topic. They stretched out many things and exaggerated a lot of information. They truly just basically found and explained sex education through the uncensored way by using many offensive terms to describe what sex education is about. there's many pros and cons to this so that's how it became a state-wide debate concerning if it was right or wrong.

Looking back to the John Locke theory, his idea was for everyone to go by and be free with the theory of LIFE, LIBERTY, PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Through my own thought I agree that the Planned parenthood had a right to do this because this fell into liberty, how they are able to make it if they want, and it's their Pursuit of Happiness so I predict that as true. Last life, they are not harming anybody and before any school shows a sex ed video everyone has to commit and permission slips are sent home for parents consent . So, I think planned Parenthood had a point because they obeyed all rules and teens can't really live behind censored boxes their whole life.

ABC News :Edgy Sex Ed Videos for Teens **Spark** Debate

No comments: